Rating reports

Afghan Connection
Input

Dr. Fane was inspired to switch her degree course from languages to medicine after working in rural India. Her medical training elective course was spent in Pakistan. In order to attend to female patients there, blonde and blue-eyed Dr. Fane was disguised as a man to travel around the region, with her taking considerable risks in doing so. In rural Pakistan, she came into contact with Afghan refugees for the first time. Charity trustees include medical, business, and journalism professionals.

Key Financials

Year end 31 May (£000s) 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009E
Income
Project restricted income 55 5 160 215 300 400
Unrestricted income 222 82 74 52 75 100
Investment income 1 6 0.1 2 3 8
Total income 278 93 234 270 378 508
Expenses
Project expenses 102 198 68 426 135 500
Costs of generating funds 2 4 6 6 8 10
Administration expenses 9 11 9 20 9 20
Total expenses 113 213 83 452 152 530
Balance of project restricted funds 9 0 154 34 45 50
Reserves
210 100 97 35 70 80
Number of employees
0 0 2 2 2 2

Afghan Connection does not spend funds until project costs have been raised, reducing the financial risk. This explains the deficit in 2007 and the variations in income used on projects (this averages out across the years).

Construction has to stop during the winter so currently project timing is dependent on fund receipt timing.

Income and expenditure growth varies as a result, as the construction costs are intermittent. The 4 year income growth from 2003 works out at 35% per year, however.

The administrative expenses ratio seemed higher in 2004 and 2006 only due to the lower total expenditure levels and building projects undertaken during those years. The programme ratio is particularly strong, reflecting exceptional efficiency and performance. The charity is run by two dedicated UK staff who were parttime and also partly volunteer until recently. These could and should develop into fully remunerated positions without significant deterioration of ratios if core costs can be funded.


Key ratios
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009E
Proportion of restricted income 20% 5% 68% 80% 79% 79%
Proportion of income used on projects 37% 214% 29% 158% 36% 98%
Programme ratio 90% 93% 83% 94% 89% 94%
Administration ratio 8% 5% 10% 4% 6% 4%
Fundraising efficiency 1p 4p 3p 2p 2p 2p
Reserve development 286% -52% -3% -64% 112% 7%
Number of months of cost coverage 24 6 n/a 1 8 2
Development Ratings estimates

 

In 2007, 33% of income was derived from general donations, functions and events, and several Afghan donors. Trusts made up 59% of income and twinned schools raised 6%. The 2% balance is from merchandising income mainly from the sale of Dr. Fane’s beautiful photographs of Afghanistan.


Previous page: Home
Next page: Ratings criteria