Rating reports
Key data
| Income | £2.5m |
| Programme ratio | 92% |
| Admin. expenses ratio | 8% |
| Fundraising efficiency | 1p |
Output
Courses for >38,000 young people; improved schools for >145,000 children; ~250,000 reached by radio learning programmes
Reports
- Afghan Connection
- Africa Educational Trust
- Africa Now
- African Initiatives
- AfriKids
- Andrew Lees Trust
- BasicNeeds
- Blue Dragon
- Book Aid International
- Build Africa
- Cambodia Trust
- Excellent Development
- Health Unlimited
- Homeless International
- IMPACT Foundation
- International Childcare Trust
- MicroLoan Foundation
- Motivation Charitable Trust
- MSAVLC
- MyC4
- Nepal Leprosy Trust
- Pestalozzi Overseas Childrens Trust
- Prospect Burma
- Pump Aid
- Refugees United
- Riders For Health
- ShelterBoxTrust
- SolarAid
- Survivors Fund
- Target Tubercolosis
- Tools for Self-Reliance
- Tree Aid
- VETAID
- Vision Aid Overseas
- Women and Children First
Director Dr. Michael Brophy OBE is a former secondary school teacher. His post-graduate academic studies were in curriculum development and distance teaching evaluation. Dr. Brophy has worked in The Gambia, The Seychelles, Bhutan and Jordan, in roles for DfID, UNESCO and the British Council. Deputy Director Jill Landymore has 25 years experience in scholarships and university service. Other key staff have backgrounds in education, academia, the law, and administration, in addition to extensive African knowledge and work experience. Trustees include a charity director, a former Foreign Office analyst, university deputy vice-chancellors and rectors, the UNICEF Chief of Education, and specialists in African politics, risk management, law, and multi-cultural and disability education. Patrons include Lord & Lady Kinnock and Philip Pullman.
| Key Financials |
|
|||||
| Year end 31 August (£000s) | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009E |
| Income | ||||||
| Project restricted income | 877 | 1,324 | 1,447 | 2,369 | 3,389 | 2,580 |
| Unrestricted income | 58 | 34 | 55 | 63 | 57 | 125 |
| Investment income | 15 | 18 | 18 | 19 | 31 | 25 |
| Total income | 950 | 1,376 | 1,520 | 2,452 | 2,477 | 3,000 |
| Expenses | ||||||
| Project expenses | 788 | 1,097 | 1,259 | 1,697 | 2,396 | 2,550 |
| Costs of generating funds | 4 | 3 | 4 | 10 | 16 | 20 |
| Administration expenses | 194 | 198 | 179 | 219 | 205 | 220 |
| Total expenses | 986 | 1,299 | 1,442 | 1,925 | 2,618 | 2,790 |
| Balance of project restricted funds | 569 | 686 | 782 | 1,300 | 1,119 | 1,000 |
| Reserves |
144 | 148 | 155 | 181 | 195 | 400 |
| Number of employees (UK/Overseas) |
8/2 | 8/3 | 9/4 | 9/7 | 9/8 | 9/8 |
The Trust has high levels of institutional funding which is low cost fundraising. This explains the negligible fundraising efficiency. As a result, though, restricted income is rather high. This reduces the Trust’s flexibility to respond to occasional eventualities and to develop core functions to replicate its work.
| Key ratios | ||||||
| 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009E | |
| Proportion of restricted income | 92% | 96% | 95% | 97% | 96% | 95% |
| Proportion of income used on projects | 83% | 80% | 83% | 69% | 97% | 85% |
| Programme ratio | 80% | 84% | 87% | 88% | 92% | 91% |
| Administration ratio | 20% | 15% | 12% | 11% | 8% | 8% |
| Fundraising efficiency | <1p | <1p | <1p | <1p | 1p | 1p |
| Reserve development | 12% | 3% | 5% | 16% | 8% | 106% |
| Number of months of cost coverage | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
| Development Ratings estimates |
In 2008, the country breakdown of restricted funds was: Somalia/Somaliland/Puntland 76%; Southern Sudan 19%; Swaziland 3%; Kenya 1%, and the balance in Uganda, South Africa and UK programmes.
Income was fairly static in 2008 as a large tranche of project funding came in just after the year end. There is a good rise forecast for 2009, however.
In 2008, income was derived from the following sources: institutions 69%, trusts and foundations 27%, and the 4% balance from individuals and sundry income. Major donors for the year were the EU, DfID, Comic Relief, and the British Council.
The Trust has high
Previous page: Home
Next page: Ratings criteria